## Search found 158 matches

- Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:20 pm
- Forum: Physics
- Topic: Dependance of "g"
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**12323**

### Re: Dependance of "g"

That does not mean $2$ depends on $b$. Whatever $b$ is, $2$ is always $2$, it does not depend on anything. as far as I know left side of a equation always depends on the right side....yes,you have used here 2 which is a constant...but we was conversing about g..this is also a constant...there are t...

- Fri Dec 31, 2010 10:54 pm
- Forum: Physics
- Topic: Dependance of "g"
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**12323**

### Re: Dependance of "g"

If 2 = ab..you can get 2 after using the value of b in the right side of this...so....

- Fri Dec 31, 2010 12:22 pm
- Forum: Physics
- Topic: Dependance of "g"
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**12323**

### Re: Dependance of "g"

Ok..according to the updated defination of function we can define function with dependent and independent variable....y=2x..here, y is depending on the value of x..so,why you want to say that in 2=ab...2 is not depending on b?

- Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:00 pm
- Forum: Physics
- Topic: Dependance of "g"
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**12323**

### Re: Dependance of "g"

yes, from this theory

F=mg

we can say that g depends on m..........

F=mg

we can say that g depends on m..........

- Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:51 pm
- Forum: Physics
- Topic: Dependance of "g"
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**12323**

### Re: Dependance of "g"

@Tanvir....of course 9.8......now see g is a constant for a specific place,if I take 420 as the value of m I have to take the value of F 4116.Here no other value of F is acceptable..because g is a constant.What will be the value of F ,it is depends only the value of m....Why I can't use the value of...

- Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:31 pm
- Forum: Secondary Level
- Topic: fermat's number
- Replies:
**7** - Views:
**2764**

### Re: fermat's number

Sorry..

- Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:42 pm
- Forum: Divisional Math Olympiad
- Topic: number theory problem
- Replies:
**10** - Views:
**3238**

### Re: number theory problem

I can't understand the question...if the given series is divided by 30 how can we get remainder????/

- Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:19 pm
- Forum: Secondary Level
- Topic: fermat's number
- Replies:
**7** - Views:
**2764**

### Re: fermat's number

Ok, this is an easy problem..if you read in wikipedia about FERMAT NUMBER you can get the answer........2^2^5=2^32=4294967297

so ,you can see that 4294967297/641...........and that is your ans.

so ,you can see that 4294967297/641...........and that is your ans.

- Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:27 am
- Forum: Physics
- Topic: Dependance of "g"
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**12323**

### Re: Dependance of "g"

420 kg..

- Tue Dec 28, 2010 11:43 pm
- Forum: Physics
- Topic: Dependance of "g"
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**12323**

### Re: Dependance of "g"

Thens is not so satisfactory to me......you have written that F/m does not depend on m...look F is a variable..so, if we want to get a constant value of F/m I have to change m with the respect of F...if F/m does not depend on m you can change the value of F without changing the value of m.....but it...