NMO problem
I need help with the following problem:
Prove that if an arithmetical progression of positive integers contains a square, then it contains infinitely many squares.
Hope to get a solution asap. Thank you!
Prove that if an arithmetical progression of positive integers contains a square, then it contains infinitely many squares.
Hope to get a solution asap. Thank you!
-
- Posts:461
- Joined:Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:05 am
- Location:Dhaka
- Contact:
Re: NMO problem
Let $a_i = a_0 + n r $ is an arithmatic progression for $n= 0, 1, 2...$
Let $a_c=m^2 = a_0 + c r$ a perfect square in the sequence. then put $ n=c+2m+r $
then$a_{c+2m+r} = a_0 + (c+2m+r)r = a_0 +cr + 2mr + r^2 = m^2 +2mr + r^2=(m+r)^2$ And so there are infinitely many squares in the sequence.
Let $a_c=m^2 = a_0 + c r$ a perfect square in the sequence. then put $ n=c+2m+r $
then$a_{c+2m+r} = a_0 + (c+2m+r)r = a_0 +cr + 2mr + r^2 = m^2 +2mr + r^2=(m+r)^2$ And so there are infinitely many squares in the sequence.
You spin my head right round right round,
When you go down, when you go down down......(-$from$ "$THE$ $UGLY$ $TRUTH$" )
When you go down, when you go down down......(-$from$ "$THE$ $UGLY$ $TRUTH$" )
Re: NMO problem
Why do we put this expression "n=c+2m+r" into the original formula?
Also, I knew that the nth term of an arithmetic progression could be written as "a + (n-1)d". I'm not aware of the form used. :S
Also, I knew that the nth term of an arithmetic progression could be written as "a + (n-1)d". I'm not aware of the form used. :S
Everybody is a genius; but if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its entire life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
Re: NMO problem
Just replace $n-1 \rightarrow n$,$a \rightarrow a_0$ and $d \rightarrow r$ to derive one formula from another.
And the theme of this solution is called "completing the square"
And the theme of this solution is called "completing the square"
Please read Forum Guide and Rules before you post.
Use $L^AT_EX$, It makes our work a lot easier!
Nur Muhammad Shafiullah | Mahi
Use $L^AT_EX$, It makes our work a lot easier!
Nur Muhammad Shafiullah | Mahi
-
- Posts:461
- Joined:Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:05 am
- Location:Dhaka
- Contact:
Re: NMO problem
I just work backward.I assume if $a_c=m^2$ then let $a_x=k^2$ and $K>m$. We have to find $x$.Now $ K^2 -m^2=r(x-c)$. Now i just test it by putting $k-m=r$ then i found that $x=c+2m+r$ and it works.
You spin my head right round right round,
When you go down, when you go down down......(-$from$ "$THE$ $UGLY$ $TRUTH$" )
When you go down, when you go down down......(-$from$ "$THE$ $UGLY$ $TRUTH$" )
Re: NMO problem
I didn't get the last step. The part where you say: "Now i just test it by putting k−m=r then i found that x=c+2m+r and it works. " How come?
It's my first time at such questions. Kindly elaborate. Thanks.
It's my first time at such questions. Kindly elaborate. Thanks.
Everybody is a genius; but if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its entire life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
-
- Posts:461
- Joined:Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:05 am
- Location:Dhaka
- Contact:
Re: NMO problem
First, don't be afraid to question where you can't understand in this forum. In our L.H.S=$k^2 -m^2$ = $(k+m)(k-m)$
R.H.S.=$r(x-c)$ . So $r|(k+m)(k-m)$ . That's why i was curious what will happen if $r=k-m$. And the trick worked!
R.H.S.=$r(x-c)$ . So $r|(k+m)(k-m)$ . That's why i was curious what will happen if $r=k-m$. And the trick worked!
You spin my head right round right round,
When you go down, when you go down down......(-$from$ "$THE$ $UGLY$ $TRUTH$" )
When you go down, when you go down down......(-$from$ "$THE$ $UGLY$ $TRUTH$" )
Re: NMO problem
As far as I have gathered from the posts above, we first write down the general formula of an A.P:
$a_i=a_0+nr$
Then we represent a perfect square using this notation: $a_c = a_0+cr = m^2$
Let $a_x = k^2$ where $k > m$
=>$ k^2 - m^2 = a_x - a_c$
=> $(k+m)(k-m) = r (x - c)$
We next assume that $r = k - m$.
How do you then find $x$?
$a_i=a_0+nr$
Then we represent a perfect square using this notation: $a_c = a_0+cr = m^2$
Let $a_x = k^2$ where $k > m$
=>$ k^2 - m^2 = a_x - a_c$
=> $(k+m)(k-m) = r (x - c)$
We next assume that $r = k - m$.
How do you then find $x$?
Everybody is a genius; but if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its entire life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
- nafistiham
- Posts:829
- Joined:Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:56 pm
- Location:24.758613,90.400161
- Contact:
Re: NMO problem
then you can say
$k+m=x-c$
or,$x=k+m+c$
or,$x=k-m+2m+c$
or,$x=r+2m+c$
$k+m=x-c$
or,$x=k+m+c$
or,$x=k-m+2m+c$
or,$x=r+2m+c$
\[\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}e^{\frac{2 \pi i k}{n}}=0\]
Using $L^AT_EX$ and following the rules of the forum are very easy but really important, too.Please co-operate.
Using $L^AT_EX$ and following the rules of the forum are very easy but really important, too.Please co-operate.
Re: NMO problem
Thanks a bunch! I finally understand.
Everybody is a genius; but if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its entire life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein