comparism

For students of class 6-8 (age 12 to 14)
User avatar
Phlembac Adib Hasan
Posts:1016
Joined:Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:49 pm
Location:127.0.0.1
Contact:
Re: comparism

Post by Phlembac Adib Hasan » Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:41 pm

Listen, you must avoid using calculators.Because we can find $300! > 100^{300}$ by large computer.So all kinds of calculations must be avoided.
Welcome to BdMO Online Forum. Check out Forum Guides & Rules

User avatar
nafistiham
Posts:829
Joined:Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:56 pm
Location:24.758613,90.400161
Contact:

Re: comparism

Post by nafistiham » Fri Jan 27, 2012 2:03 pm

and, I think it shouldn't have been
\[In(n!)\approx nIn(n)-n\]
but,
\[ln(n!)\approx nln(n)-n\]
\[\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}e^{\frac{2 \pi i k}{n}}=0\]
Using $L^AT_EX$ and following the rules of the forum are very easy but really important, too.Please co-operate.
Introduction:
Nafis Tiham
CSE Dept. SUST -HSC 14'
http://www.facebook.com/nafistiham
nafistiham@gmail

User avatar
*Mahi*
Posts:1175
Joined:Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:46 pm
Location:23.786228,90.354974
Contact:

Re: comparism

Post by *Mahi* » Fri Jan 27, 2012 2:46 pm

Phlembac Adib Hasan wrote:Listen, you must avoid using calculators.Because we can find $300! > 100^{300}$ by large computer.So all kinds of calculations must be avoided.
You can find $ln 100$ approximately without using calculators :)
I hope you know $ln 10 \approx 2.3$
This gives $ln (100^{300}) \approx 1380$
Please read Forum Guide and Rules before you post.

Use $L^AT_EX$, It makes our work a lot easier!

Nur Muhammad Shafiullah | Mahi

User avatar
Phlembac Adib Hasan
Posts:1016
Joined:Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:49 pm
Location:127.0.0.1
Contact:

Re: comparism

Post by Phlembac Adib Hasan » Fri Jan 27, 2012 3:21 pm

Many persons have given proofs,but every proof depends on calculators at some steps.BUT IT IS NOT FAIR.The problem asks for such a proof that uses only logic, no use of calculator.
We have to prove $ 300! > 100^{300} $.We can prove a stronger result :\[n!>\left (\frac {n} {3}\right )^n \]for every positive integer.Induction is the easiest way to prove this.
Last edited by Phlembac Adib Hasan on Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Welcome to BdMO Online Forum. Check out Forum Guides & Rules

User avatar
Phlembac Adib Hasan
Posts:1016
Joined:Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:49 pm
Location:127.0.0.1
Contact:

Re: comparism

Post by Phlembac Adib Hasan » Fri Jan 27, 2012 3:25 pm

*Mahi* vaia wrote:I hope you know $ln 10 \approx 2.3$
Yes, I know it.But this must be avoided in a pure proof.
Welcome to BdMO Online Forum. Check out Forum Guides & Rules

User avatar
Phlembac Adib Hasan
Posts:1016
Joined:Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:49 pm
Location:127.0.0.1
Contact:

Re: comparism

Post by Phlembac Adib Hasan » Fri Jan 27, 2012 3:37 pm

I found another proof of this problem using Cauchy.
Welcome to BdMO Online Forum. Check out Forum Guides & Rules

User avatar
Phlembac Adib Hasan
Posts:1016
Joined:Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:49 pm
Location:127.0.0.1
Contact:

Re: comparism

Post by Phlembac Adib Hasan » Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:47 am

Welcome to BdMO Online Forum. Check out Forum Guides & Rules

Post Reply