Re: Prove me wrong
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:54 pm
Yes, sometimes \not does not show properly in the browser. In case of confusion you can click on it see the latex code.
The Official Online Forum of BdMO
https://matholympiad.org.bd/forum/
The point I am trying to establisg is that this (the above) makes no sense. What is $\frac{0}{0}$? If you cannot define it then saying that it's in real is nonsense. For $0/0$ to make sense you first need to define the division of zero by zero.Masum wrote: Let $\frac00=k\in\mathbb R$
Not exactly what I meant. You are saying about the definition but we need argument to conclude something. You need to provide some argument before conclusion of-course. But when you say that now define $\frac00$ in the same way doesn't make the sense why it can't be. But still I need to know when do we say something defined, may be well-defined? And I guess that you are claiming this because of $\frac10$. But in real why should $\frac00$ be dependent on $\frac10$.tanvirab wrote:
The point I am trying to establish is that this (the above) makes no sense. What is <span class="math">\frac{0}{0}</span>? If you cannot define it then saying that it's in real is nonsense. For <span class="math">0/0</span> to make sense you first need to define the division of zero by zero.
In other words, all of your argument is based on this assumption. But who told you that this assumption is true? No one. Because it is not true. You cannot assume something that is not true and then make arguments based on that. For any of your arguments to make any sense, you first need to prove that this assumption is true. Is it true?Masum wrote: Let $\frac00=k\in\mathbb R$
Who said that it is not true? At least no one can sense them Then when shall you say that is false. After some kinds of stuffs I used. Isn't it?Otherwise, how can you expect to have them proved.tanvirab wrote:In other words, all of your argument is based on this assumption. But who told you that this assumption is true? No one. Because it is not true. You cannot assume something that is not true and then make arguments based on that. For any of your arguments to make any sense, you first need to prove that this assumption is true. Is it true?Masum wrote: Let $\frac00=k\in\mathbb R$
Actually I wanted to explain it only using the definition I gave. Then how shall you conclude that $3@0$ defined or undefined?tanvirab wrote:Just to make it clear, when you say something about something you need to know what that things is i.e. you need to define it.
For example when I say $3/4$ I can define it, but when I say $3@4$ that does not mean anything, because I have not defined it. When I say $0+0$ I can define it, but no one has so far defined $0/0$. So, before even starting to talk about $0/0$ you need to say what it is. What is $0/0$?