Re: Prove me wrong
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 3:34 pm
Sure. that's what I have asked probably 20 times in this thread. What is the definition of $0/0$? Define it.Masum wrote: may we define it some other way?
The Official Online Forum of BdMO
https://matholympiad.org.bd/forum/
Sure. that's what I have asked probably 20 times in this thread. What is the definition of $0/0$? Define it.Masum wrote: may we define it some other way?
I think the logic that was represented by Sir, is not strong enough to explain this. Sir just said that when we approach from both positive and negative end, we approach infinity but what if it is exactly $0$? The answer he said is "it is not possible to reach $\frac10$" but there is the problem. He didn't explain why so was. So I am not satisfied at all with this explanation. This does not make any sense to me.raihan khan wrote:1/0 is never infinity lim x tends to zero 1/x is infinity. zafar sir said that by numerical method.if you set a number that is very nearly o from the left side of the number line it would be a left hand limit and if you set from the right side it would be right hand limit. the expression is
lim 1/x = infinity lim 1/x = - infinity
x tends to o+ x tends to 0-
because that is not defined. You cannot talk about something that is not defined. So reaching $0$ in that limit would not make any sense.Masum wrote: "it is not possible to reach $\frac10$"
My point was the same. Well, I didn't argue about the definition or $\frac10$ is defined or something like that? But you can't say just after saying that we approach from both end, and say that $\frac10$ is undefined, how can it make sense?tanvirab wrote:because that is not defined. You cannot talk about something that is not defined. So reaching $0$ in that limit would not make any sense.Masum wrote: "it is not possible to reach $\frac10$"
In any case, "limit" does not mean you reach anything. Look at the definition of limit. You never have to reach anything, it just says about going close to things.
What are you talking about? I though the question was why we cannot reach $1/0$?Masum wrote:Oh again, the definition!! Who told them about this? I told about the explanation of Sir! Agartala is not Amtala, right? You are saying this just because you yourself can make an explanation with the help of definition. But can you convince a primary student with this explanation of Zafar Sir? Why are you mixing up things? That is complete non-sense.