Prove me wrong

For students of class 11-12 (age 16+)
raihan khan
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:30 pm
Location: Dhaka

Re: Prove me wrong

Unread post by raihan khan » Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:04 am

I am saying on thing with great courtesy :
class 2 te ekata manosanko aschilo kono kisuke sunno dara vag korle vagfal ki hoi ans cilo vag kora jai na.
jodi oita correct hoi tahole ki seita class 2 er baccar jonnoi toiri kora defination na. vaiara limit er baparta nije theke likh si bhul hole plese amar concept ta clear kore den

tanvirab
Posts: 446
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:08 am
Location: Pasadena, California, U.S.A.

Re: Prove me wrong

Unread post by tanvirab » Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:10 am

ক্লাস টু এর মানসাংকের উত্তর সম্পূর্ণ সঠিক।

User avatar
Masum
Posts: 592
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:12 pm
Location: Dhaka,Bangladesh

Re: Prove me wrong

Unread post by Masum » Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:09 pm

Well then you are borrowing the concept of limit, more precisely you are saying about proceeding considering positive and negative. First please, explain to me why is that? Why do we have to consider them? Where is definition?
Raihan, certainly that was correct!
One one thing is neutral in the universe, that is $0$.

tanvirab
Posts: 446
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:08 am
Location: Pasadena, California, U.S.A.

Re: Prove me wrong

Unread post by tanvirab » Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:22 pm

I am not borrowing the concept of limit. I am saying that the concept of limit has nothing to do with $1/0$.

User avatar
Masum
Posts: 592
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:12 pm
Location: Dhaka,Bangladesh

Re: Prove me wrong

Unread post by Masum » Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:27 am

tanvirab wrote:I am not borrowing the concept of limit. I am saying that the concept of limit has nothing to do with $1/0$.
Yes that is what I am saying, get me? Limit has nothing to do with this. Then how is the explanation complete? It never makes any sense. And it used no definition as well.
One one thing is neutral in the universe, that is $0$.

tanvirab
Posts: 446
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:08 am
Location: Pasadena, California, U.S.A.

Re: Prove me wrong

Unread post by tanvirab » Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:43 am

The explanation is not complete. (In fact, as I mentioned, it is slightly wrong)

Post Reply