fermat's last theorem

For discussing Olympiad Level Number Theory problems
Farhan Hasin Zarif
Posts:2
Joined:Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:58 pm
fermat's last theorem

Unread post by Farhan Hasin Zarif » Tue Mar 05, 2013 9:25 am

Can the cases of prime numbers be proved?

User avatar
*Mahi*
Posts:1175
Joined:Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:46 pm
Location:23.786228,90.354974
Contact:

Re: fermat's last theorem

Unread post by *Mahi* » Wed Mar 06, 2013 9:51 am

Farhan Hasin Zarif wrote:Can the cases of prime numbers be proved?
Doing so would actually complete the proof :P
Please read Forum Guide and Rules before you post.

Use $L^AT_EX$, It makes our work a lot easier!

Nur Muhammad Shafiullah | Mahi

SMMamun
Posts:57
Joined:Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:57 pm

Re: fermat's last theorem

Unread post by SMMamun » Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:20 pm

Hi Farhan, can you please elaborate your question? Because Fermat's last theorem has been proved for the general case of integer n, thus including the prime number cases of n as well. However, do you mean anything else by the 'cases of prime numbers'?

User avatar
Masum
Posts:592
Joined:Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:12 pm
Location:Dhaka,Bangladesh

Re: fermat's last theorem

Unread post by Masum » Thu Mar 14, 2013 2:49 pm

If you prove that $a^n+b^n=c^n$ doesn't have no solution for $n=p$ a prime, then it's done. That's what he meant.
One one thing is neutral in the universe, that is $0$.

SMMamun
Posts:57
Joined:Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:57 pm

Re: fermat's last theorem

Unread post by SMMamun » Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:48 pm

In that case, just questioning whether "the cases of prime numbers CAN be proved" might give the impression that any proof of Fermat's Last Theorem is still incomplete and requires further proof for the cases of primes, but, as I said earlier, this has already been done (by Wiles and Taylor) and the proof is agreed by the mathematicians and historians of mathematics to be complete as of today. Then Farhan's question could have been a little more specific. :)

Post Reply