I am saying on thing with great courtesy :
class 2 te ekata manosanko aschilo kono kisuke sunno dara vag korle vagfal ki hoi ans cilo vag kora jai na.
jodi oita correct hoi tahole ki seita class 2 er baccar jonnoi toiri kora defination na. vaiara limit er baparta nije theke likh si bhul hole plese amar concept ta clear kore den
Prove me wrong
Re: Prove me wrong
ক্লাস টু এর মানসাংকের উত্তর সম্পূর্ণ সঠিক।
Re: Prove me wrong
Well then you are borrowing the concept of limit, more precisely you are saying about proceeding considering positive and negative. First please, explain to me why is that? Why do we have to consider them? Where is definition?
Raihan, certainly that was correct!
Raihan, certainly that was correct!
One one thing is neutral in the universe, that is $0$.
Re: Prove me wrong
I am not borrowing the concept of limit. I am saying that the concept of limit has nothing to do with $1/0$.
Re: Prove me wrong
Yes that is what I am saying, get me? Limit has nothing to do with this. Then how is the explanation complete? It never makes any sense. And it used no definition as well.tanvirab wrote:I am not borrowing the concept of limit. I am saying that the concept of limit has nothing to do with $1/0$.
One one thing is neutral in the universe, that is $0$.
Re: Prove me wrong
The explanation is not complete. (In fact, as I mentioned, it is slightly wrong)